Hurt on a New York Job Site? Three Laws Could Change Everything That Happens Next

For more than 30 years, our firm has been helping New Yorkers who’ve been injured because of someone else’s negligence or wrongdoing. And if there’s one group of people I wish I could sit down with before they ever get hurt, it’s construction workers. Because if you do construction work in New York, there are three laws that can completely change what happens after a job site injury. Although many workers have heard of them, they oftentimes have no idea who they protect, what they cover, or why they’re so powerful. 

So let me break it down in plain English: Labor Law sections 200, 240 and 241(6). What they cover, the work they apply to, the damages you can recover, and the defenses the other side is going to throw at you to try to knock out your claim. If you do construction work in New York or know someone who does, this is information you need to have. 

First, the big picture 

Construction is one of the most dangerous industries in this state. Workers climb, lift, cut, weld, and demolish, often at heights, often around heavy equipment, and almost always under pressure. I’ve never met a contractor or subcontractor who was ahead of schedule. They’re behind. They’re under the gun. They’re pushing to get the job done. 

New York’s legislature understood something important about all of this: workers don’t control the job site. They don’t choose the equipment. They don’t design the safety plan. They don’t set the pace. The owners and the general contractors do. 

So these laws shift responsibility upward to the people who actually have the power to make a job site safe. That’s the whole idea behind them, and it’s the thread that connects all three. 

Labor Law § 240 — the “Scaffold Law” 

This is the one you’ve probably heard of. But despite the nickname, it’s not just about scaffolds. 

Section 240 protects workers from elevation-related and gravity-related hazards,  meaning falls from heights and injuries from falling objects. If you’re on a ladder, a scaffold, a roof, or a hoist, or you’re underneath something that should have been properly secured, section 240 is in play. And it applies to a wide range of work: construction, demolition, repairs, alterations, painting, cleaning, pointing. If you’re doing physical work on a structure, chances are you’re covered. 

Under this law, owners and general contractors have to provide proper safety devices such as ladders that don’t wobble, scaffolds that are secured, harnesses, lifelines, and hoists, and they have to make sure those devices are placed and used correctly. 

Here’s what makes section 240 so strong: it’s strict liability. If there’s a violation of the statute, and that violation causes an injury, the owner and the general contractor are responsible. Period. Your own comparative negligence, meaning a mistake you may have made, is not a defense. 

That doesn’t mean they won’t try to get around it. They’ll argue the “recalcitrant worker” defense: that you refused to use the safety device they gave you. Or the “sole proximate cause” defense: that your own failure to exercise reasonable care was the sole cause of the incident. Or they’ll argue it wasn’t an elevation-related risk at all. 

These defenses are narrow, they’re strictly construed, and courts interpret section 240 very broadly in favor of injured workers. But you can count on them being raised in almost every case. 

What you can actually recover 

This is where these laws matter most, so let me be clear about it. 

If you’re a construction worker hurt on the job, you’re entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Comp will pay your medical bills and a portion of your lost earnings. But it pays nothing for pain and suffering or your loss of enjoyment of life. 

In a third-party action brought under section 240, you can recover the full extent of your damages: pain and suffering, lost earnings, medical expenses, and future economic loss. That is far more than any worker can ever recover through Workers’ Comp alone. 

Labor Law § 241(6) — the Industrial Code 

This section also applies to construction, excavation, and demolition work, and it requires owners and general contractors to provide a safe place to work and to follow specific industrial code regulations. 

And that’s one of the key differences between 241(6) and 240. Section 241(6) is tied to the Industrial Codes, a compilation of state regulations that govern construction sites. To bring a claim under this section, you have to point to a specific, concrete regulation that was violated, not just a general safety rule. 

There are a lot of these regulations. They can cover missing guardrails, tripping hazards, unsafe flooring, a lack of proper protective equipment, and much more. 

Here’s the second key difference: unlike 240, section 241(6) is not strict liability. You have to prove the violation caused your injury, and your own alleged comparative negligence does apply, meaning the owner or contractor will argue that your own fault caused and/or contributed to the accident. 

But either way, if you prevail, you’re entitled to the same full measure of damages you’d be entitled to recover under section 240. 

Labor Law § 200 — the safe workplace duty 

Section 200 is essentially New York’s codification of the common-law duty to provide a safe workplace. It applies to all kinds of hazards, not just height-related risks or Industrial Code violations. 

There are two theories under Labor Law § 200: 

Means and methods. Did the owner or general contractor supervise or control the work that caused the injury? If so, they can be held responsible. 

Notice. Did they create or have notice of the dangerous condition on the job site? If so, again, they can be held responsible. 

If the answer to either question is yes, section 200 can apply. 

The common defenses here are predictable: that they didn’t supervise the work, that they didn’t control the means and methods, or that they had no notice of the dangerous condition. These cases are very fact-specific and shift from one situation to the next, but the defenses are the same ones you’d see in any personal injury lawsuit. 

And the damages? The same as under section 240 and 241(6): pain and suffering, economic loss, medical expenses, and past and future lost earnings. 

A few things these laws have in common 

Across all three statutes, the types of work covered are broad and the courts construe them broadly on purpose. The point of these statutes is to protect workers, not to shield owners and general contractors from their negligence. 

Routine maintenance and purely decorative work generally fall outside these laws. But even those lines are fact-driven and fact-specific. These are not cases that get decided by a snap judgment or a quick interpretation. 

The bottom line 

These laws matter because Workers’ Comp benefits are almost never enough. Comp will cover your medical bills and a slice of your lost earnings, but it will not compensate you for your pain and suffering or the long-term impact a serious injury can have on the rest of your life. 

The Labor Law holds the parties with the most control over safety accountable, and it requires them to make sure the workplace they control is safe for the people doing the work. 

So, if you’re a construction worker in New York and you’ve been injured on the job, you may have rights under one or more of these statutes. Don’t assume you’re limited to Workers’ Compensation. Don’t assume that because the accident may have been partly your fault, you have no recourse. And don’t assume you’re not protected. 

If you have questions, reach out. I’m always happy to talk you through your specific situation and help you understand whether we can help. 

Injured on a New York construction site? Call us today. 

212-226-6662 

Jonathan R. Ratchik — Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC. Experience you expect, commitment you deserve. 

Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC|  www.kdrpilawyers.com  |  Attorney Advertising